How international elections are observed and reported

TUREFF• •0

When a country holds an election, news reports often mention what international observers said about it. Those statements can carry real weight, but they are frequently summarised in a single line that hides what observers actually looked at. This guide explains what election observation is, how missions work and how to read their findings.

What election observation is

Election observation is the systematic, impartial assessment of an electoral process by people who are not part of it. Observers watch and report; they do not run the election, count votes or decide disputes. International missions are generally deployed only when the host country invites them. In 2005 a group of intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations adopted, at the United Nations, the Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation and an accompanying code of conduct for observers. Organisations that endorse it commit to standards such as independence, impartiality and transparency about their methods.

Who observes

Intergovernmental organisations. Examples include the OSCE's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights in its region, the European Union, the African Union, the Organization of American States and parliamentary assemblies.
International non-governmental organisations with long experience of observation.
Domestic, non-partisan citizen observer groups, which can often deploy far more people across the country than international missions.
Party agents, who represent candidates at polling stations. They are not neutral and are distinct from observers.

What observers look at

A good mission assesses the whole process, not just polling day.

The legal framework and whether it meets international commitments.
Election administration, including the independence and capacity of the electoral body.
Voter and candidate registration.
The campaign, including freedoms of assembly and expression and any misuse of public resources.
The media environment and how fairly candidates are covered.
Voting, counting and the tabulation of results.
Complaints and appeals and how they are handled.

How a mission is organised

A needs assessment visit may take place months ahead to decide whether and how to observe.
A core team of experts is based in the capital.
Long-term observers are deployed across the country weeks before the vote to follow the campaign and preparations.
Short-term observers arrive shortly before election day and visit a sample of polling stations to watch voting and counting.
Findings are compiled using standard forms so results can be compared across many polling stations.

Statements and reports

Preliminary statement. Many missions present preliminary findings at a press conference shortly after election day, often the next day. This comes before the whole process, including complaints and final results, is complete.
Final report. A fuller report follows later, often some weeks after the mission ends, with detailed analysis and recommendations for future elections.

The recommendations are often the most useful part, because they point to specific changes in law and practice.

How to read election observation news

Look for the actual wording. Observers rarely give a simple pass or fail. Statements typically note both strengths and shortcomings.
Check who observed and for how long. A full mission covering the campaign is different from a small delegation present only on polling day.
Separate observation from results. Observers comment on the process; official results come from the election authorities.
Wait for the final report if a dispute continues.
Be careful with unofficial observers. Some groups describe themselves as observers without following recognised standards or methods.

Have you ever followed an election observation report, or volunteered as an observer? Share your experience in the comments.